ѻý

Skip to content

Scrap food waste plan too much to digest, Kelowna city staff say

'There are significant uncertainties with location, design, technical features, and space requirements'
compost-3663514_1280
City staff are recommending against joining the Regional District of Central Okanaganѻýs proposed food waste program.

A plan to add food scraps to Kelownaѻýs curbside collection is likely to be shelved.

City staff are recommending against joining the Regional District of Central Okanaganѻýs (RDCO) proposed food waste program, saying the move doesnѻýt make financial or logistical sense at this time.

ѻýThere are significant uncertainties with location, design, technical features, and space requirements,ѻý staff wrote in a report going to council on June 9. ѻýThese factorsѻýcombined with costѻýmake this the wrong time to proceed.ѻý

The RDCOѻýs plan involves letting residents toss food waste into green bins, expanding yard waste pickup to weekly year-round, and reducing garbage collection to every other week. While 73 per cent of surveyed residents liked the idea, city staff say the math doesnѻýt work.

Kelowna households currently pay $198 per year for curbside collection. Adding food waste service would bump that up by $60 to $70ѻýa 30 to 35 per cent increase.

The cityѻýs Glenmore landfill already handles about 45,000 tonnes of organic material each year, but isnѻýt equipped to process food waste due to space, odour, and wildlife concerns. Staff say a new transfer station would be neededѻýestimated at $12 million, though likely higher in an urban setting.

Another challenge is future growth. About 65 per cent of new homes in Kelowna will be apartments, which arenѻýt part of the curbside program. Commercial waste from hotels, grocers, schools, and restaurants wasnѻýt included in the proposal either.

Staff arenѻýt against the idea entirely. Theyѻýre asking council to revisit food waste collection in the 2030 Regional Solid Waste Management Plan, with a focus on including both multi-family and commercial sectors.

For now, though, the city isnѻýt ready to bite.

ѻýStaff recommend not proceedingѻý due to the estimated cost impacts, uncertainty in the implementation, and a preference to consider impacts to the program from commercial food waste and the growing percentage of multi-family units.ѻý



About the Author: Gary Barnes

Journalist and broadcaster for three decades.
Read more