The Hancock Wildlife Foundation is offering a $5,000 reward to the person who cut down a prominent eagleѻýs nest tree off Croydon Drive ѻý but only if that person can provide proof of who paid them to do the job.
Foundation founder David Hancock said that itѻýs obvious the tree cutter didnѻýt act alone, and he would like to know who funded the operation.
ѻýAt some time, maybe the kid who (cut down the tree), will say, ѻýOK, five grand, Iѻým going to rat on the guy that paid me.ѻý Thatѻýs what weѻýre hoping,ѻý Hancock said Tuesday.
July last year, the City of Surrey received a call that a tree, located on private property at 2112 160 St., had been partially cut and was at risk of falling.
A city arbourist visited the site that afternoon and determined that the tree was at a high risk of falling due to it being cut on both sides, and almost all the way through.
Hancock supervised the removal of the tree, and agreed that there was no alternative ѻý the tree had to come down.
RELATED:
The tree was home to an eagle nest, which Hancock had observed for the previous eight years. The nest could be easily spotted from Highway 99, and was active every year.
Last year, the city told Peace Arch News that an investigation had been opened by both the city and province, and that the vandalism to the tree was an infraction of the cityѻýs tree-protection bylaw and the provincial Wildlife Act.
Conservation Service officer Alicia Stark told PAN this week that the investigation is still open.
The minimum fine that could be imposed under the Wildlife Act is $575. However, the investigation is complicated due to a lack of witnesses.
Under the cityѻýs tree-protection bylaw, fines of up to $2,000 can be issued.
RELATED:
ѻýWe havenѻýt had anyone come forward with information but are still wanting people to call our (Report All Poachers and Polluters) line if they have information,ѻý Stark wrote to PAN. ѻýWe havenѻýt been able to lay any charges.ѻý
Even though itѻýs been a little more than a year since the tree was damaged, Hancock said heѻýs still regularly asked by residents for an update on the investigation.
ѻýIt always comes up,ѻý Hancock said. ѻýEvery time I give a talk in the region, itѻýs the first question ѻý what happened? It really is.ѻý
Although the tree came down July last year, Hancock suspects that the cut was probably made in May.
ѻýIt was slowly dying. He only cut about a little over half of it. The birds, who were on eggs or had very tiny young, they abandoned the nest and they went and built another nest.ѻý
Despite losing their home, the pair of eagles ѻý Hancock caught the male and equipped it with a GPS-tracking device ѻý appear to be doing just fine.
ѻýWhen they came back after their migration, they went straight to (the new nest) and raised three young there, this yearѻý I have not caught the female yet. Itѻýs my great wish to catch the female so we know where the pair goes. I tried and tried and I couldnѻýt catch her, sheѻýs very suspicious.ѻý
Hancock has caught and installed GPS devices on 17 birds. All of which, he said, are northern breeders.
The eagles returned from their northern adventures on Sept. 22.
Hancock said heѻýs scheduled to have a meeting Wednesday to try and analyze data received from the GPS devices, and come up with a theory of why all the eagles seemed to have returned on the exact same day.
ѻýThe big thing is probably the fact that itѻýs so competitive in the Lower Mainland, that if you donѻýt get back and look after your nest, somebody else is going to claim it.ѻý
Hancock said, ѻýin the bird world,ѻý the first eagle to claim a nest as its territory is, statistically, most likely to win the battle.
Hancock said that cutting down eagles nests, despite the illegality, has been happening for years in the province.
ѻýOver my lifetime, even in the 30 years that Iѻýve lived here, Iѻýve just watched dozens and dozens and dozens of eagles nests just get chopped down,ѻý Hancock said, adding that only recently has there been more enforcement on the illegal activity.
ѻýOnly since the NDP took power that weѻýve saved a single eagle nest,ѻý he said. ѻýThe concern, or the difference is, has to do with the enforcement of the Wildlife Act. That happened only when the NDP got in, all of the other governments have neglected it.ѻý