When Patricia Smuga rescued two calves from a dairy farm last summer she thought it was an act of kindness. Instead, she乌鸦传媒檚 being investigated for violating a federal law.
Smuga and her husband Ernest operate Cici Life Farm Sanctuary, a home for abused and neglected farm animals, near Winlaw, B.C. The pair purchased a pair of injured and sickly bull calves in August from a West Kootenay dairy farm.
But the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is now investigating the sanctuary for violating the Health of Animals Act, which says injured farm animals can乌鸦传媒檛 be transported.
乌鸦传媒淚t乌鸦传媒檚 crazy that they are using this against us,乌鸦传媒� said Patricia Smuga.
Bull calves at dairy farms are usually either sold for veal or destroyed onsite. There乌鸦传媒檚 also no use for them as breeders, since cows are artificially impregnated.
Smuga said the calves were purchased for $175, and estimated the family has since spent around $8,000 in veterinary bills to rehabilitate the animals.
One of the calves, which was five days old when it was purchased, was malnourished and had a parasitic infection that was healed after antibiotic treatment. The other had a leg with nerve damage and couldn乌鸦传媒檛 walk properly. It乌鸦传媒檚 currently in a cast. 乌鸦传媒淪everal vets thought we should put him down,乌鸦传媒� said Smuga.
Related:
Dr. Andrew Mack, a Cranbrook-based inspector with the CFIA, visited the sanctuary on Nov. 30. When contacted by the Star, Mack乌鸦传媒檚 office deferred to the CFIA乌鸦传媒檚 media relations office.
In a statement sent to the Star, the CFIA said its investigation was prompted after being contacted about the sale by an unidentified person.
乌鸦传媒淭he CFIA routinely conducts inspections based on these types of reports to gather additional information about the circumstances involved in the transport of potentially compromised animals,乌鸦传媒� reads the statement. 乌鸦传媒淚nspections normally involve contacting the owners of the farm of origin, the destination premises and any transporters involved in the movement of the animals.乌鸦传媒�
The releases adds no decision has been made on the case.
Subsection 138 of the federal regulations, which pertains to sick, pregnant and unfit animals, says non-ambulatory animals cannot be loaded, unloaded or transported. An exemption exists for veterinary treatment, but only if agreed to by a vet prior to the transportation.
Smuga says the calves were taken directly to a vet after they were purchased, although they hadn乌鸦传媒檛 previously been given the clearance to do so. Their current vet works in Vernon, which has meant several trips for checkups and surgery.
乌鸦传媒淭he only time we乌鸦传媒檝e ever transported them was to the vet,乌鸦传媒� said Smuga. 乌鸦传媒淚 didn乌鸦传媒檛 take them to the park or randomly around town for no reason. They were taken for medical care every single time.乌鸦传媒�
Anna Pippus, a Vancouver-based animal justice lawyer advising the Smugas, says she乌鸦传媒檚 never previously heard of the CFIA investigating an animal rescuer.
乌鸦传媒淚 think the bigger question is why is the person who is attempting to alleviate the distress of animals is under investigation rather than the person who put the animals in distress in the first place?乌鸦传媒� said Pippus.
乌鸦传媒淭his is such a classic example of law enforcement getting the wrong guy.乌鸦传媒�
If found guilty the family could face a fine ranging between $500 to $1,500, according to the CFIA. Pippus said there乌鸦传媒檚 also the possibility that the calves are confiscated.
Smuga declined to say which farm she purchased the calves from. The problem, in her opinion, isn乌鸦传媒檛 one dairy farm 乌鸦传媒� it乌鸦传媒檚 the entire industry乌鸦传媒檚 treatment of animals.
乌鸦传媒淚 believe the practices that happen in order for us to have dairy and produce dairy on a large scale that goes to stores and people can buy come with this suffering and exploitation of animals,乌鸦传媒� she said.
tyler.harper@nelsonstar.com
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter
