ѻý

Skip to content

Farnworth reaches for checkmate in Surrey policing transition dispute

Public Safety minister introduces legislation Monday that provides ѻýclarity and finalityѻý to Surrey residents
web1_231019-sul-farnworthleg-rivals_1
Public Safety Minister Mike Farnworth and Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke. (File photos)

The provincial government is updating the Police Act in an effort to prevent the same mess from occurring that continues to define Surreyѻýs policing transition to the Surrey Police Service from the Surrey RCMP.

ѻýPeople deserve to know who is protecting their homes, families and businesses when there is a change in policing in their community,ѻý Public Safety Minister and Solicitor General Mike Farnworth said Monday in Victoria. ѻýThese amendments mean that the confusion caused by the City of Surrey wonѻýt be repeated elsewhere in B.C. When passed, these amendments will ensure policing transitions proceed in a way that provides certainty for people and maintains public safety.ѻý

Farnworth said the legislation provides ѻýclarity and finalityѻý to Surrey residents concerning the transition. ѻýAmendments to the Act will specify that the City of Surrey must provide policing services through a municipal police department. It also provides the authority for the solicitor general to cancel the existing agreement between the Province and the City of Surrey for the provision of RCMP services.ѻý

Premier David Eby said Tuesday that whether or not Surrey is moving forward to a municipal police force ѻýis no longer up for discussion, they are moving forward to a municipal force in Surrey and for everybodyѻýs benefit we need to just get on with that work.ѻý

Farnworth said the legislation also provides, ѻýif necessary,ѻý the provincial government with the ability to appoint an administrator to ѻýassume the functionsѻý of the Surrey Police Board to oversee the SPS.

To follow the billѻýs progress through the legislator, you can check out

Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke is not conceding defeat. ѻýWe are still all in the process of reviewing it and we will continue to do that,ѻý she said of the legislation released Monday afternoon.

ѻýIѻým going to be really clear ѻý the City of Surrey has made a position, weѻýre not changing that position.

ѻýFirst and foremost, weѻýre here to protect the taxpayers of this province,ѻý Locke told reporters. ѻýWe know that the cost of this transition is extraordinary.ѻý

Eby said Tuesday itѻýs ѻýfrustratingѻý his government and Surrey arenѻýt on the same page. ѻýI think there is a moment here to regroup with the city, to reset. It is very clear that the city will not be successful in any legal challenge, itѻýs a waste of taxpayer dollars, the Province is going in this direction, so letѻýs sit down, letѻýs move forward.ѻý

During her Monday presser Locke referenced an easel beside her podium displaying a ѻývery conservativeѻý $464 million more attached to the SPS over keeping the RCMP over the next 10 years ѻý not including capital costs and two-officer patrol cars. ѻýThis is going to be a tremendous increase to taxes in Surrey,ѻý she warned. ѻýThat is a minimum, an absolute minimum. That is money that should be left in the pockets of Surrey taxpayers at a time when affordability remains our number-one issue.ѻý

ѻýThis is going to be a tremendous increase to taxes in Surrey,ѻý she warned. ѻýThat is a minimum, an absolute minimum. That is money that should be left in the pockets of Surrey taxpayers at a time when affordability remains our number-one issue.

ѻýWe will do everything always to protect our taxpayer,ѻý Locke said. ѻýI will do everything always to protect our taxpayer.ѻý

The provincial government said it will provide Surrey with $150 million toward the cost of the transition but Locke says thatѻýs not nearly enough. Asked if his government will provide more money to Surrey, Eby said the ѻýbig challengeѻý is the longer the dispute is dragged out, the more expensive it gets. He said it behooves Surrey to ѻýsit down with the Province, not to be going to court to spend more money on lawyers on a decision thatѻýs already been made and will not be overturned by a court.

ѻýThe mayor fought a good fight, she raised a lot of important issues,ѻý Eby said, but ѻýnow itѻýs time for us to sit down and sort it out.ѻý

ѻýThe Province has committed to Surrey that we will support them, we understand their additional costs here, we will be working with that and Iѻým happy to have those discussions with Surrey,ѻý Eby said.

On Oct. 13, the City of Surrey revealed it has filed a petition with the Supreme Court of British Columbia seeking a judicial review of Farnworthѻýs July 19 order to proceed with the SPS. The government has 21 days to file a response.

Asked what she thinks Mondayѻýs development will have on Surreyѻýs case, Locke replied she ѻýcanѻýt speculate on anything with the courts. And again, we havenѻýt even really looked at the legislation so I canѻýt make any speculation in that regard.ѻý

Asked if this means checkmate for Surrey, Coun. Linda Annis replied, ѻýI hope this means that weѻýre done and weѻýre moving forward with the transition. I do think the ministerѻýs saying enough is enough, we need to get on with it.ѻý

Locke did say of the legislation that Farnworth could have made his case last December, but did not.

ѻýItѻýs incredibly disappointing that this minister has taken so long to make a decision,ѻý she said, adding ѻýhe could have said a lot of what heѻýs saying today, he could have said it way back in December. He chose not to, so weѻýre in this position now.ѻý

Again on the $464 million cost, Locke said, ѻýThis is going to be generational, this is going to be forever. This is going to be for my kids, my grandkids, and we need to make sure that we have protected the taxpayer in our city.ѻý

During a press scrum after the Legislative Assemblyѻýs Monday sitting, when Farnworth was asked what will happen with Surreyѻýs court petition in light of the legislation, he replied that ѻýthe Province always has the ability to govern, and thatѻýs what weѻýre doing. The court process, thatѻýs up to the City of Surrey.ѻý

Asked when his ministry will file a formal response to Surreyѻýs court petition, Farnworth replied ѻýthat work is done by the legal services branch and they make those decisions.ѻý

At Monday nightѻýs regular council meeting, Locke doubled down on Surrey councilѻýs majority position to stick with the RCMP.

She said sheѻýs instructed city staff to undertake a review of the policing transition, from day one to now. ѻýI want us in Surrey to have a clear understanding of what has transpired over the last five years.ѻý

ѻýMy position, this councilѻýs position, has not changed,ѻý Locke said. ѻýI continue to oppose the transition because of the extraordinary cost for Surrey taxpayers that will deliver no public safety benefit.ѻý

Locke added itѻýs ѻýsimply not feasibleѻý for Farnworth to say that a police service representing just 25 per cent of frontline officers today is best positioned to be Surreyѻýs police of jurisdiction.

ѻýThe SPS is top-heavy and itѻýs failed to recruit anywhere near the number of frontline officers needed to be the police of jurisdiction in the city. Surrey Police (Service) recruitment efforts are and will continue to be destabilizing for police services throughout Metro Vancouver and around the province. Let me be very clear again ѻý I will not sit on the sidelines and accept a provincial plan that will cost Surrey taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, lead to significant tax increases, and that will deliver no public safety benefit.ѻý



About the Author: Tom Zytaruk

I write unvarnished opinion columns and unbiased news reports for the Surrey Now-Leader.
Read more



(or

ѻý

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }