ѻý

Skip to content

BREAKING: Former Surrey mayor Doug McCallum found not guilty of public mischief

Judge Reginald Harris delivered his verdict in Surrey provincial court Monday
31077936_web1_221124-SUL-McCallumVerdict-BCPush-final_1
Former Surrey mayor Doug McCallum talks to media after being found not guilty of public mischief Monday (Nov. 21). (Photo: Anna Burns)

Former Surrey mayor Doug McCallum has been found not guilty of public mischief.

Judge Reginald Harris rendered his Monday in courtroom 101, Surrey provincial courtѻýs largest courtroom.

ѻýIn my view, it defies logic that Mr. McCallum would deliberately mislead the police and then immediately suggest they get evidence, the video, that would show him to be a categorical liar and destroy his efforts to mislead,ѻý Harris reasoned. ѻýLogically, he would not have suggested to police to try and get a video of the event if he was intentionally misleading.ѻý

ѻýThe presumption of innocence confirms our faith in humankind,ѻý Harris noted. To convict on ѻýsuspicion,ѻý he added, ѻýwould be wrong.ѻý

McCallum, 77, was charged with one count of public mischief contrary to Section 140(2) of the Criminal Code, stemming from an encounter on Sept. 4, 2021 between himself and a group of volunteers that was gathering petition signatures outside the South Point Save-On-Foods store in South Surrey for a referendum on the policing transition.

Following the verdict, McCallum read out a short statement, at the courthouse entrance, in which he understandably said heѻýs ѻýpleased with the decision,ѻý thanked his legal team for ѻýtheir tremendous efforts in this case,ѻý and gave a ѻýspecial thanksѻý to his family for their support and understanding. ѻýI appreciate also the sensitivity of the media in covering my case, and to the people of Surrey, I love you, I love all of you.ѻý

He did not take questions.

His trial began on Oct. 31 and concluded on Nov. 9.

McCallumѻýs four-lawyer defence team was led by Richard Peck, K.C., opposite Special Prosecutor Richard Fowler.

After a 13-year break from the mayorѻýs chair, which he occupied from 1996 to 2005, McCallum was sworn in by a judge on Nov. 5, 2018 for his fourth term as Surreyѻýs mayor. Brenda Locke, of Surrey Connect, defeated him for the mayorѻýs seat in the Oct. 15 election by 973 votes.

One of Lockeѻýs election promises was to make McCallum pay for his own legal costs in this case, rather than Surrey taxpayers having to foot the bill. Locke said sheѻýs instructed city staff to that end, ѻýand that they are to seek outside legal for an opinion regarding the cityѻýs obligation.ѻý

Former Surrey councillor Laurie Guerra, a Safe Surrey Coalition councillor who was defeated along with McCallum on Oct. 15, she tears of happiness at the verdict. She said outside court she ѻýabsolutelyѻý thinks this case damaged McCallumѻýs prospects of being re-elected.

ѻýMost of the residents in Surrey are law-abiding citizens. We donѻýt think for a second that our police and that our Crown prosecutor is going to charge somebody without having a really high threshold that is met in their evidence ѻý but wrong. We were wrong. Even I second-guessed it.ѻý

She thinks the charge was ѻýone of the reasonsѻý that cost him the election. ѻýI think that paints a bad picture.ѻý

The court heard McCallum told police Johnstone ran over his leg and foot with her Mustang in the parking lot then drove off in a ѻývery dangerousѻý manner. ѻýI really on this one want to go after her,ѻý McCallum told police.

Fowler said ѻýthe question will beѻý if McCallum intended to mislead police into believing she had done something illegal ѻýby making false statements to the police with the intention to cause Ms. Johnstone to be suspected of having committed an offence.ѻý

ѻýHe said she had pinned him,ѻý Fowler told the court. ѻýThat simply did not happen.ѻý

The court reviewed CCTV footage from the grocery storeѻýs entrance looking out into the parking lot where Johnstone confronted McCallum, they had an exchange, she drove off and he then walked to the store. ѻýIt became unpleasantries between the two of us, back and forth,ѻý Johnstone testified. ѻýIt was a heated debate. I told him he was the worst mayor that Surrey ever had. I told him he was mean-spirited and a liar.ѻý

Johnstone said she didnѻýt hear, feel or see anything unexpected and doesnѻýt recall McCallum saying anything to her as she drove off. Later that afternoon, police told her she was being investigated for assault with a weapon and criminal harassment.

ѻýA review of the CCTV video footage clearly shows that Ms. Johnstone had not committed any of the offences suggested by Mr. McCallumѻýs statement,ѻý Fowler argued before the court.

Defence lawyer Eric Gottardi said in final submissions it is ѻýpreposterousѻý to suggest there was an attempt at public mischief on McCallumѻýs part, and asked for an acquittal.

ѻýThe Crown cannot prove that the accused communicated false information to a peace officer,ѻý Gottardi argued. He said it wasnѻýt McCallumѻýs intent to waste police officersѻý time or ѻýto get revengeѻý on Johnstone.

The Crown proceeded summarily in the case. Criminal cases are prosecuted either by indictment, summarily or a hybrid of the two. Summary offences are the least serious of the three.

A summary offence in B.C. is considered to be in the realm of petty crime and under the Criminal Code of Canada is the least serious type of offence.

Harris noted the video confirmed McCallum was not pinned against his car and ѻýthereѻýs nothing to suggest that Johnstoneѻýs speed was different from the other vehicles in the lot.ѻý Nor did anything in the video suggest McCallum was in significant pain, the judge noted. He also considered testimony that adrenaline can suppress pain, which will start to ѻýemerge and intensity as the adrenaline begins to wane.ѻý

He concluded that McCallum and Johnstone being in the same place, at the same place, was a coincidence.

ѻýDespite the coincidence of their simultaneous presence, I find their interaction resulted in Ms. Johnstoneѻýs deliberate and targeted acts,ѻý he said. ѻýAfter confirming it was Mr. McCallum, she stealthily approached him from behind then, and without warning, she commenced a verbal assault. All of this occurred when Mr. McCallum was simply walking in a parking lot.ѻý

As for McCallumѻýs claim he was pinned, Harris noted that ѻýthe courts have recognized the common sense understanding that the distortion of memory can occur during stressful or traumatic events.ѻý

ѻýI am satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that Ms. Johnstone ran over his foot.ѻý

Johnstone said sheѻýs ѻýdisappointedѻý with the decision. ѻýI remain adamant that I did not run over Mr. McCallumѻýs foot with my car.ѻý



tom.zytaruk@surreynowleader.com

Like us on Follow us on   and follow Tom on

Breaking News You Need To Know

Sign up for free account today and start receiving our exclusive newsletters.

Sign Up with google Sign Up with facebook

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and apply.

Reset your password

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and apply.

A link has been emailed to you - check your inbox.



Don't have an account? Click here to sign up


About the Author: Tom Zytaruk

I write unvarnished opinion columns and unbiased news reports for the Surrey Now-Leader.
Read more



(or

ѻý

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }