A B.C. cityѻýs victory in a human rights complaint over a rainbow flag cost just over $62,000.
After the flag flew at Langley City hall to mark Pride Week, conservative and anti-SOGI Langley activist Kari Simpson went to the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal in 2018 to argue the banner ѻýpanders to sex activism, bully tactics, child abuse and special rights for certain groups.ѻý
In response, the City hired the law firm of Norton Rose Fulbright to defend the matter at a B.C. Human Rights Tribunal hearing.
A report to council filed on Sept. 30 by Chief Administrative Officer Francis Cheung described the process as ѻýlengthy and involved.ѻý
ѻýWhile the City was successful in defending itself against the complaint, the effort and time required by the Cityѻýs solicitor to prepare and submit evidence was considerable, resulting in legal costs totalling $62,058.05,ѻý Cheung wrote.
READ ALSO:
Unlike a court case, where a successful applicant can apply to have the other party or parties pay a portion of their legal costs, at a Humans Right hearing costs are less likely to be awarded, with the Human Rights Code saying they can be ordered when a party ѻýhas engaged in improper conduct during the course of the complaint.ѻý
When the City rejected Simpsonѻýs complaint about the Pride flag, she asked to fly what she called the ѻýCanadian Christian Flagѻý on what she termed the ѻýNational Day of Blessing.ѻý
Simpson identified herself as the ѻýhead organizer for the Langley Christian Flag committee and the organizer for the National Day of Blessingsѻý when she launched her complaint to the tribunal.
READ ALSO:
ѻýAccording to publicly available information filed by the City, the City says that Ms. Simpson appears to be the creator of the ѻýNational Day of Blessingsѻý and the ѻýCanadian Christian flagѻý and Oct. 1, 2018 appears to be the first time that Ms. Simpson celebrated this day and flag,ѻý the tribunalѻýs judgment said. ѻýMs. Simpson does not dispute this.ѻý
Simpson held a rally outside City hall at which the flag was displayed, but it was not raised on a City flagpole.
In April, the tribunal .
There was no evidence of any danger to her life, or of how the City might have incited ѻýcontempt and hatred for Christiansѻý as she claimed, the ruling stated.
It went on to point out the long history of discrimination against LGBTQ+ people.
ѻýPride celebrations help to counteract the historical discrimination committed against LGBTQ+ communities and help to bring those communities from a position of disadvantage to a more equal standing with heterosexual and cisgendered individuals who have historically enjoyed societal acceptance,ѻý the ruling said. ѻýThe act of flying the Rainbow Flag also serves a similar purpose.ѻý
dan.ferguson@langleyadvancetimes.com
Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter