ѻý

Skip to content

Landlord denies tenant security camera use, B.C. law vague on subject

Vancouver Island man wanted cameras to track stepfather with Alzheimerѻýs
31866161_web1_221124-CCI-Security-cameras-dispute-camera_1
Legislation in B.C. around tenantsѻý rights to install security cameras on their rented properties is vague. (Metro Creative Services photo)

Ken Twyman is frustrated with the provinceѻýs legislation around tenants installing security cameras in their rented homes.

Twyman lives in the Cowichan Valley in a rented home with his elderly parents, including his 90-year-old war veteran stepfather who has Alzheimerѻýs disease.

He said his stepfather has a tendency to wander, a common symptom of Alzheimerѻýs, so he installed a number of security cameras so he could monitor him and know which direction he was heading in if he went missing.

Twyman didnѻýt inform his landlord about the cameras because he didnѻýt think he needed permission, but the landlord was quite adamant about them being taken down, and the law was on his side.

Twyman said he made some phone calls to some provincial agencies and did some research and found that the legislation around security cameras in homes and the rights of tenants is quite broad and not easily defined.

ѻýIt appears that landlords can put up security cameras on their rental properties without getting the tenantsѻý permission, regardless of the invasion of privacy, but tenants have to get permission,ѻý he said.

ѻýIf thatѻýs the case, then the legislation should be changed.ѻý

Robert Patterson, a lawyer with the provinceѻýs Tenant Resource & Advisory Centre, said the question of tenantsѻý rights when it comes to installing security cameras is a complex one, and thereѻýs very little in the Residential Tenancy Act around such issues.

He said the act contains a section describing what landlords can and canѻýt do with regards to security cameras, but not tenants.

ѻýIt seems in this case that the tenant has a compelling reason to install security cameras, but they canѻýt cover common areas and neighboursѻý yards, for example,ѻý Patterson said.

ѻýIf that was done, it could be considered an unreasonable intrusion upon privacy, but itѻýs a grey area in the act as to the tenantsѻý rights.ѻý

Patterson said if tenants are ordered by their landlords to take down security cameras and they feel that they have a good reason to have them up and are not intruding on other peopleѻýs privacy, they could apply to dispute it and an arbitrator from the Residential Tenancy Branch might be appointed to hear the case.

ѻýThis tenant seems to have a reasonable argument that security cameras should not be prohibited in this case, but you never know what an arbitrator will find and rule on,ѻý he said.



Robert Barron

About the Author: Robert Barron

Since 2016, I've had had the pleasure of working with our dedicated staff and community in the Cowichan Valley.
Read more



(or

ѻý

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }