There were a few unhappy councillors at the end of Mondayѻýs (Apr.22) meeting following a failed attempt to reconsider pay raises voted on and passed a week ago.
Councillor Ron Cannan made the motion to reconsider which was supported by Coun. Mohini Singh.
ѻýCan we ask for greater clarity on why, we make so many decisions day in and day out, we need to reconsider this decision?ѻý asked Mayor Tom Dyas.
Cannan pointed out that he made a request at the end of last weekѻýs (Apr. 15) meeting that he wanted to be on the record as opposed to adopting the remuneration bylaw.
Dyas asked Cannan why he had a change of heart.
ѻýThere wasnѻýt,ѻý Cannan replied. ѻýI missed the vote it was my mistake. I waited until the end of the meeting so as not to disrupt proceedingsѻýI asked to be on the record as being opposed. I was told I canѻýt because our council procedure bylaws require it to come back for reconsideration.ѻý
City clerk Laura Bentley confirmed that ѻýcouncil may put forward a motion to reconsider a decision already made.ѻý
READ MORE: Kelowna council still divided over pay increase
During the Apr. 15 meeting, an item before the remuneration bylaw was removed from the agenda, which appeared to confuse some councillors as to which matter they were voting on.
ѻýI made a mistake,ѻý admitted Coun. Rick Webber regarding the deleted item. ѻýIt had been taken off the agenda kind of on the fly and I hadnѻýt caught on to that, I was distracted.ѻý
Webber said by the end of that meeting he wondered if council actually voted on remuneration. ѻýI had to go back and look at the tapes and saw indeed we did vote, and we all voted yes. It was later I realized I voted on the wrong thing.ѻý
Although, Webber added he did not see a need to reconsider the matter as the result is not likely to change.
Councillors Singh and Gord Lovegrove said they made similar mistakes. Singh said previously that she is not opposed to a raise, just the amount.
ѻýI would like to see my vote documented as being against it, but I donѻýt have a big problem with it.ѻý
Lovegrove said he and his colleagues voted on something they missed.
ѻýWe were distracted, whatever words you want to use. Reconsideration could overturn that bylaw and thatѻýs not where Iѻým going with supporting this motion.ѻý
Coun. Loyal Wooldridge said that revisiting the decision would set a dangerous precedent.
ѻýIt is incumbent on us to be paying attention to the agenda and the clerk does a great job of ensuring where we are at in the agenda.ѻý
Lovegrove attempted to make a motion, citing a parliamentary rule that would allow council (with 75 per cent support) to amend the minutes of the Apr. 15 meeting to reflect the non-support of the four councillors.
Dyas didnѻýt allow that, prompting Cannan to call for a point of order and ask the city clerk if that was a possibility. Bentley noted that the minutes had already been adopted by council.
ѻýThe minutes reflect what transpired in the meetingѻýitѻýs not practice to amend them after the fact.ѻý
Dyas said in reviewing the video of the Apr. 15 meeting it was clear to him how councillors voted.
ѻýI do not want to get into a practice of turning around and revisiting decisions especially when weѻýre dealing with major developments and if something gets into a 5-4 vote and want to change our vote at the end of a meeting I donѻýt want to set that precedent.ѻý
Council voted down Cannanѻýs motion.
READ MORE: Evacuated apartments residents demand solutions from UBC, City of Kelowna
READ MORE: Dead man found near Big White investigated as homicide: RCMP