ѻý

Skip to content

B.C. casino workers laid off during pandemic launch class-action lawsuit

Notice of civil claim filed in Supreme Court of B.C. in Nanaimo against Great Canadian Gaming
25535794_web1_210623-NBU-Nanaimo-Casino-Class-Action-2_1
Kimberly Bussiere and other laid-off employees of Casino Nanaimo have launched a class-action lawsuit against the Great Canadian Gaming Corporation. (Chris Bush/News Bulletin)

Laid-off casino Nanaimo employees have filed a class-action lawsuit in Supreme Court in B.C., claiming the company acted in bad faith and wrongfully dismissed them during the COVID-19 pandemic.

According to court documents filed April 6, Catherine Fanning, Kimberly Bussiere and Samantha Heffel are leading the civil suit against Casino Nanaimo operators Great Canadian Casinos Inc. and Great Canadian Gaming Corporation.

They claim the casino ѻýfailed to discharge their obligations of good faith, honesty and fair dealings with class members in effecting the terminationsѻý of casino workers.

Business was halted March 16, 2020, due to COVID-19, at which time Casino Nanaimo operators laid off employees. Great Canadian also issued a memorandum stating workers were not allowed to ѻýdraw down on banked statutory vacation pay.ѻý Utilizing accumulated vacation time ѻýwas suspended,ѻý and ѻýlong-term disability pay and benefits, for which [the corporation] self-insured, were terminatedѻý immediately, the suit claims.

The plaintiffs allege that when they cleaned out their lockers in July, certain employees who were owed tips received envelopes with cash from a trunk of a managerѻýs vehicle.

Another memo distributed in September contained ѻýfalse informationѻý the plaintiffs allege, and outlined a ѻýforced buyout process,ѻý which would be equal to termination pay under the B.C. Employment Standards Act, amounting to one week of pay per year of service up to a maximum of eight weeks, disregarding years of service.

This past January, the company again offered a buyout, said the plaintiffs, but this time capped payouts at $2,500 and changed requirements that settlement money be taken as severance. This would make them ineligible to receive employment insurance, they allege, and in addition, they say another proposal wouldnѻýt be coming until this summer.

The plaintiffs say that the company should have known that it was ѻýconducting a mass termination of employees without adequate compensation for the longer notice period applicable under the [act].ѻý

The lawsuit said the company is claiming the workers are still employed, as it is continuing to pay for benefits, but the premiums were waived by Manulife Financial and the B.C. government. Bussiere said she and the plaintiffs have been removed from e-mail lists and Facebook pages.

Bussiere also said she couldnѻýt comment on the monetary compensation sought.

ѻýSome of us have been working there for 30-plus years and myself, 22 years,ѻý said Bussiere. ѻýAt my age, itѻýs hard to get another job and get trained to a position where I would be making what I was making as an employee of the casino. You put in 22 years, youѻýve put a lot of time in and youѻýre expecting to retire and have a pension and all of a sudden youѻýre unable to access any of that.ѻý

Bussiere said Nanaimo is the only Great Canadian Gaming Corporation casino without a union.

The plaintiffs are being represented by Martin Sheard and Geraldine Teixeira. The News Bulletin has reached out to both for comment.

In an e-mail, Chuck Keeling, Great Canadian Gaming Corporation executive vice-president of stakeholder relations and responsible gaming, said it wasnѻýt able to say much as it is a legal matter.

ѻýAs the matter is before the courts, we do not have a comment,ѻý Keeling said. ѻýWe would note, however, we are eagerly anticipating the reopening of Casino Nanaimo as early as July 1, subject to receiving approval from the provincial government and [Dr. Bonnie Henry] to do so. We have been closed due to a government mandated suspension of operations since March 16, 2020, to support the provinceѻýs efforts to contain the spread of COVID.

ѻýTo support the propertyѻýs reopening, we have already called back approximately 75 of our team members, and we are looking forward to having them back on the job.ѻý

The corporation has 21 days after it is served with the notice to file a response.

None of the claims have been proven in a court of law.

For more news from Vancouver Island and beyond delivered daily into your inbox, please

READ ALSO:



reporter@nanaimobulletin.com

Like us on and follow us on



Karl Yu

About the Author: Karl Yu

I joined Black Press in 2010 and cover education, court and RDN. I am a Ma Murray and CCNA award winner.
Read more



(or

ѻý

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }