When the District of Saanich proposed borrowing $150 million earlier this year to redevelop its aging municipal works yard, it didnѻýt seek approval through a referendum.
Instead, council used B.C.ѻýs (AAP), a mechanism that allows governments to assume public consent unless at least 10 per cent of eligible voters formally object.
By the June deadline, more than 10,000 residents had submitted objection forms ѻý enough to stop the borrowing plan.
Across B.C., the AAP is being used more frequently by municipalities to fast-track costly infrastructure projects. At least nine processes have been initiated so far in 2025, matching the total recorded for all of 2024. Projects range from recreation facilities and sewer upgrades to land purchases and operations centres.
Among the municipalities using the AAP this year are Saanich, Kelowna, Prince George, and the cities and districts within the Capital Regional District, Regional District of Nanaimo, Columbia Shuswap, and Okanagan-Similkameen.
Efficient or erosive?
The process is outlined in and is considered a cost-effective alternative to a referendum. Local governments must publish notices for at least 30 days and distribute elector response forms. If fewer than 10 per cent of voters object, the proposal proceeds without a formal vote.
The Ministry of Housing and Municipal Affairs says the AAP offers several benefits, including reduced administrative costs, faster timelines, and an early gauge of public sentiment. The ministry provided background information for this story, but did not provide any official statements. The provincial government is not considering changes to the AAP process at this time.
However, critics say the system lacks transparency and risks sidelining meaningful public engagement.
ѻýItѻýs a form of negative-option voting, and thatѻýs simply wrong ѻý especially for major infrastructure projects,ѻý said John Treleaven, chair of the . ѻýIf you donѻýt respond, your silence is counted as approval. That flips the democratic principle on its head.ѻý
Public backlash varies
In Kelowna, the city used an AAP in 2023 to borrow $241 million for a major recreation centre replacement and two new activity hubs. Just over 4,100 objections were submitted ѻý far below the roughly 12,000 required to halt the plan.
Mayor Tom Dyas defended the process, saying the city held multiple open houses and met all notification requirements. Still, not everyone was satisfied.
ѻýA lot of people donѻýt even know this is happening,ѻý said resident Renee Del Colle, who canvassed neighbourhoods to raise awareness about the project.
In Saanich, council successfully used AAPs to approve smaller loans for park, sewer, and drainage upgrades. But when it proposed borrowing $150 million for the works yard redevelopment, opposition swelled.
ѻýWe try to stay on top of whatѻýs happening in Saanich, so we were aware it would come forward as an AAP,ѻý said Nancy Di Castri, president of the Save Our Saanich Neighbourhood Society. ѻýIt kind of feels like an end run around the public. Most people donѻýt know itѻýs happening ѻý and under the AAP, silence is consent.ѻý
Her group organized about 50 volunteers to canvass door to door.
ѻýWeѻýd ask if people were aware of the AAP ѻý 99 out of 100 werenѻýt. Once they understood what was happening, most were eager to sign.ѻý
Di Castri said the opposition wasnѻýt against updating the aging yard, but questioned the scale of the proposal.
ѻýThe plan included soil remediation, closure of the garden waste drop-off, prepping for future infrastructure, and setting the site up for a 99-year lease with a developer. Our position was: Why are taxpayers paying for that?ѻý
Roughly 12 per cent of eligible voters submitted objection forms ѻý more than enough to stop the plan.
Errors ѻý not opposition
The City of Nanaimo attempted to use the AAP twice to fund a new operations centre, but both efforts were withdrawn due to mistakes in public notices.
ѻýThe alternative approval process requires precision,ѻý said Coun. Ben Geselbracht. ѻýIf you make a misstep, it can undermine public trust and derail the project.ѻý
Nanaimo eventually proceeded with a scaled-back, $90-million version of the project, funded through borrowing and repaid via property taxes. Council has since advocated for making AAPs optional for essential infrastructure.
Calls for reform
The ministryѻýs municipalities provide unbiased information, disclose full project costs, and ensure the process is clearly communicated. Early engagement through public meetings and open houses is also encouraged.
Still, concerns persist.
ѻýWhen I submitted my form in the CRDѻýs recent AAP, I got no confirmation,ѻý Treleaven said. ѻýFive days later, I submitted another ѻý and only then received acknowledgment. That kind of uncertainty undermines confidence.ѻý
He likened AAPs to the negative-option billing model once used by cable TV providers ѻý and later struck down by the Supreme Court of Canada.
ѻýIf itѻýs not acceptable for selling TV packages, it shouldnѻýt be acceptable for public decision-making."
Treleaven said municipalities need to invest in communication if they choose to use the AAP.
ѻýSure, itѻýs cheaper than a referendum ѻý but thatѻýs no excuse to cut corners. People need to understand whatѻýs being proposed and how they can respond.ѻý
He and others are calling for reforms to the Local Government Act.
Tough calls ahead
With infrastructure needs growing and budgets tight, B.C. municipalities are relying more on the AAP. But increased use has brought increased scrutiny.
Some critics are advocating for several reforms, including making referenda mandatory for large-scale borrowing, reducing the threshold for objections to below 10 percent, and allowing more time for electors to respond.
ѻýFor $150 million, asking the public through an AAP isnѻýt enough,ѻý said Di Castri. ѻýIt wouldѻýve been more fair to put it to a vote.ѻý
She also questioned the projectѻýs urgency.
ѻýTheyѻýve been talking about fixing those buildings since 1998,ѻý she said. ѻýSuddenly itѻýs urgent? Itѻýs not the publicѻýs fault nothing was done sooner.ѻý
The says it has no plans to revise the 10 per cent threshold or submission rules ѻý for now.
Still, the conversation around public engagement and municipal accountability continues.
ѻýPublic engagement has been steadily diminishing over the years,ѻý said Di Castri. ѻýThe AAP felt like the final straw.ѻý
ѻý With files from Black Press Media publications