ѻý

Skip to content

Nelson ecologist questions B.C.ѻýs roll-out of old growth strategy

Rachel Holt was part of a technical panel that mapped old growth
27426756_web1_211209-KWS-RachelHolt-pressconf_1
Dr. Rachel Holt at a Dec. 1 video press conference on old growth forests held by the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs. Photo: Video screenshot, Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs

A Nelson ecologist who served as part of a provincial government panel that mapped B.C.ѻýs remaining old growth forest is concerned about the way the government has implemented the panelѻýs work.

The Old Growth Technical Advisory Panel identified and mapped 2.6 million hectares of at-risk old growth forest.

In a Nov. 2 news release, the province said it would respond to the report by asking First Nations to identify forests within the 2.6 million hectares that should not be cut, and the province would defer harvesting in those areas pending further discussions. First Nations were given 30 days to do this ѻý a deadline that expired on Dec. 2.

But otherwise, logging has not stopped in those 2.6 million hectares, even temporarily.

ѻýThey havenѻýt deferred anything,ѻý Holt says. ѻý[They are] not deferring unless [a First Nation] sticks their hand up and says they want to defer. So thatѻýs the urgency, because those blocks are being logged, anywhere there is a cut block.ѻý

The term ѻýdeferral,ѻý in the provincial governmentѻýs old growth discussions, means pausing logging in a specific area, not necessarily stopping it indefinitely.

The other members of the technical panel were forest policy analyst Lisa Matthaus, ecologist Karen Price, landscape analyst Dave Daust, and forester Garry Merkel.

Dr. Rachel Holt and her colleagues on the province’s Old Growth Technical Advisory Panel used provincial data to create this map, on which the red areas are big-treed old-growth. Map: Government of British Columbia
Dr. Rachel Holt and her colleagues on the provinceѻýs Old Growth Technical Advisory Panel used provincial data to create this map, on which the red areas are big-treed old-growth. Map: Government of British Columbia

The panelѻýs report, entitled , released on Nov. 2, identified and mapped 2.6 million hectares of old growth in several categories, and recommended that logging there be deferred until a new forest management plan is developed for old growth.

ѻýDefer harvest, i.e., no development or harvesting,ѻý the report reads, ѻýin all mapped highest-priority at-risk old forests (priority big-treed old growth, ancient forest, remnant old ecosystems) while development of a new approach to forest management is underway.ѻý

Contacted by the Nelson Star, the forests ministry stated in an email: ѻýAt this time, licensees with previously approved cut blocks within the 2.6 million hectares are legally authorized to harvest timber within these cut blocks.ѻý

The provincial agency B.C. Timber Sales has stopped advertising and selling timber rights in the areas identified by the panel.

The statement went on to say that the government might eventually work with logging companies to temporarily halt harvesting in some areas identified by the panel, after it makes agreements with First Nations.

ѻýThis may include industry voluntarily halting harvest or government halting harvesting under section 13 of the Forest Act.ѻý

This is not what the technical panel recommended, which was that all current logging in areas indicated on their map should be deferred, Holt says.

ѻýThe point of the deferrals was to prevent harvest of the most high-value forest,ѻý she said, adding that currently the governmentѻýs default approach is harvesting, not protecting.

“They look small on this scale, but in the real world, they are little patches of the best remaining forest.” ѻý Dr. Rachel Holt. Map: Government of British Columbia
ѻýThey look small on this scale, but in the real world, they are little patches of the best remaining forest.ѻý ѻý Dr. Rachel Holt. Map: Government of British Columbia

Paradigm shift

The work of Holt and her colleagues came as a result of the provincial governmentѻýs April 2020 publication of , written by a two-person government-appointed panel of foresters who travelled the province getting feedback and information about old growth.

The reportѻýs authors, Garry Merkel and Al Gorley, gave the province 14 recommendations, one of which called for immediately deferring logging in old growth forests that are at risk of ecosystem loss and that would otherwise be harvested. They asked that these areas be identified and deferred within six months.

Merkel and Gorley, in A New Future for Old Forests, called for a paradigm shift from managing forests for timber supply to managing them for ecosystem health.

At the time, the province committed itself to implementing all of Gorleyѻýs and Merkelѻýs recommendations.

ѻýNow itѻýs 18 months later,ѻý says Holt.

ѻýAnd [deferrals] are not the real work,ѻý she says. ѻýThe real work is the next step. This deferral process was supposed to be short and sweet and point to the most at-risk forest, so that we could then get on with the real work of the paradigm shift of planning with a different framework.ѻý

Related:

ѻý

ѻý

ѻý

ѻý

ѻý



bill.metcalfe@nelsonstar.com

Like us on and follow us on



Bill Metcalfe

About the Author: Bill Metcalfe

I have lived in Nelson since 1994 and worked as a reporter at the Nelson Star since 2015.
Read more



(or

ѻý

) document.head.appendChild(flippScript); window.flippxp = window.flippxp || {run: []}; window.flippxp.run.push(function() { window.flippxp.registerSlot("#flipp-ux-slot-ssdaw212", "Black Press Media Standard", 1281409, [312035]); }); }